Education Graduates Earn More When Jobs Match Training, PIDS Finds
PIDS finds education graduates earn more only when jobs match their training; a license alone doesn't close the pay gap in the Philippines.
Updated

Education graduates in the Philippines earn more when their jobs match their training — that's the core finding from the Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), the state's economic policy think tank. The second half of the finding matters just as much: passing the licensure exam alone isn't enough to secure those higher earnings.
PIDS (the government's research arm for development policy) examined the labor-market outcomes of education graduates in the Philippines. Its conclusion cuts against a common assumption among Filipino graduates — that a professional license, by itself, functions as a pay premium. It doesn't. The premium shows up only when the license is paired with a job that actually uses the training.
What does the research actually say?
Two findings anchor the study. First, education graduates working in roles aligned with their field — chiefly teaching — earn more than those who drift into unrelated work. Second, a teaching license held by someone employed outside the profession does not deliver the same income benefit.
In plain words: the match between degree and job drives the pay gap, not the credential on its own.
That distinction has real weight in the Philippine context, where education is one of the most heavily enrolled degree programs and licensure exam pass rates are tracked publicly each year. Thousands of education graduates sit for the board exam annually. Many then enter an oversaturated teaching market or pivot to business process outsourcing, retail, and administrative roles.
Why the mismatch matters nationally
Labor-market economists call this credential-occupation mismatch: a worker's qualification doesn't line up with their actual job. PIDS's finding suggests the mismatch carries a measurable cost for education graduates specifically — lower earnings relative to peers who secured field-relevant posts.
For a jobs market where public-school teaching slots are limited relative to the annual supply of licensed graduates, the implication is structural. It's not simply that graduates need to pass the board exam; they need the placement that follows.
Takeaway: the pay premium sits in the job match, not the paper.
What this means for an individual graduate
If you hold an education degree, the data points to a clear hierarchy of outcomes. Field-matched work pays best. A license plus an unrelated job pays less than you'd expect. And the national supply-demand squeeze in teaching means the burden of finding a match falls heavily on the individual graduate — through specialization, location flexibility, or complementary skills.
For policy watchers, the study hands ammunition to arguments for expanding absorption capacity in education hiring, rather than raising licensure pass rates alone.
PIDS says its findings argue for stronger linkage between teacher training, licensing, and actual deployment — so the next cohort of graduates finds the match that pays.
By Tom Whitfield, Path & Pay
Source: Google News: Labor market
More from Tom Whitfield
Show full bio
Senior reporter covering regulation, policy and their impact on Job market data and labor economics at Path & Pay.
532 articles
Go deeper
- Job-Education Match and Public Sector Work Shape Philippine Education Graduates' Outcomes
- Vocational High School Graduates Are Landing High-Paying Jobs in Korea
- With or Without Diplomas: Youth Education and the Job Market
- Pakistan Loses $31.5 Billion a Year to Youth Skills Gap
- Can Gen Z Get Hired Without a College Degree? What the Data Shows