Job Market Data

Revelio Labs calls US job market 'low-hire, low-fire'

Revelio Labs' Evan Sohn tells CNBC the US labor market is 'low-hire, low-fire,' with subdued hiring and layoffs. What it means for workers and employers.

Updated

It's a low-hire, low-fire job market, says Revelio Labs’ Evan Sohn - cnbc.com
It's a low-hire, low-fire job market, says Revelio Labs’ Evan Sohn - cnbc.com — The Metropolitan Museum of Art / The Met · CC0

US employers and workers are operating in a "low-hire, low-fire" labor market, according to Revelio Labs economist Evan Sohn, a characterization he shared with CNBC that crystallizes one of the defining features of the current hiring cycle.

What does "low-hire, low-fire" actually mean?

The phrase describes a labor market in which firms are posting fewer openings and conducting fewer layoffs at the same time. Hiring intent has cooled from post-2021 highs, but employers are also retaining staff rather than conducting the wave of reductions that some economists had warned would follow the rate-tightening cycle. Sohn's framing, delivered to CNBC, puts a name on data that has shown up in muted JOLTS quits rates and softer payroll prints.

Why is Revelio Labs' read relevant to job seekers?

Revelio Labs builds its indicators from a large alternative-data set that tracks worker flows, job postings, and employer filings — the kind of granular record that can pick up shifts before they show in the official Bureau of Labor Statistics releases. For an individual evaluating market position, a low-hire, low-fire reading carries a dual signal: external mobility is constrained, so poaching and counter-offers are less common, but internal stability is also higher, meaning tenured employees face less involuntary churn.

What it means at the role and sector level

In a low-turnover regime, wage growth typically eases because competition for workers softens, while employers shift from broad hiring to targeted poaching of scarce skill sets. Workers in high-skill, constrained-supply segments — data engineering, AI research, specialized clinical roles — still see active recruiting, while broader white-collar hiring screens more applicants per requisition. Employers, meanwhile, use the pause to invest in retention, reskilling, and productivity tools rather than aggressive headcount expansion or reductions.

How does this differ from a recessionary layoff cycle?

Sohn's framing is deliberately distinct from a "low-hire, high-fire" downturn. The latter signals contraction, with employers cutting roles while also refusing to backfill. The "low-hire, low-fire" label implies a market that has rebalanced without breaking: demand for labor has cooled, but the layoffs pipeline has not opened. That distinction matters for unemployment claims, severance exposure, and the negotiating leverage of anyone considering a voluntary move.

What should workers and employers watch next?

The trajectory of the next two monthly Employment Situation releases and JOLTS reports will test whether Sohn's read holds. A drift toward higher job openings alongside steady payroll growth would mark a return to a more normal churn pattern; an uptick in initial jobless claims paired with falling postings would push the market toward the high-fire side of the spectrum. For now, Revelio Labs' read is that both sides of the labor contract — hiring and separations — are running below their 2021-2022 peaks in tandem.

Source: Google News: Job market

low-hire-low-firerevelio-labslabor-markethiring-trendsjolts

Share this article:

More from Grace Kim

Grace Kim

Show full bio

Correspondent covering money, funding and market shifts around Job market data and labor economics at Path & Pay.

503 articles

Go deeper

« Previous articleNext article »