Source Contains Only a Headline: No Rewrite Possible Without Fabrication

The supplied source item is an RSS stub from the Australian Financial Review consisting of a single headline — "Should an iced coffee really cost you the job?" — plus a link and publication credit. There is no article body, no quoted material, no data, and no named individuals or firms.

Under the editorial constraints for this assignment, a rewrite is not feasible:

• The style rules require opening with a concrete data point (a jobs figure, salary benchmark, or hiring number) with its period and geography. The source contains none.
• The rules forbid adding information absent from the source. Producing a 420–800 word article would require inventing recruiters, survey findings, or salary figures that do not appear anywhere in the delivered content.
• Named data sources, sample sizes, and revision notes cannot be cited because the stub includes no such details.

What the headline alone suggests, at most, is commentary on interview etiquette — presumably an anecdote or op-ed about whether bringing a drink (an iced coffee) into a job interview could hurt a candidate. But confirming even that framing would require accessing the full AFR article behind the link, which the feed does not expose.

Recommended action: re-run this task with the full article text extracted from the AFR link, or substitute a source item that includes the complete body. Once the article text is available, the piece can be rewritten to standard — leading with whatever hiring or labor-market figure the column actually cites, separating the Australian national context from role-level advice, and closing on the author's own forward-looking point.